There’s apparently been documents linking Saddam and bin Laden found.

“The Sunday Telegraph says reporter Inigo Gilmore discovered the
files in the bombed headquarters of the Mukhabarat, the feared Iraqi
intelligence service.”

“He told the BBC: “I noticed on some of the documents there were
some marks erased out… we scraped away with a razor and underneath we
found the name Bin Laden three times and obviously realised this was
highly significant.”

“He said: “Perhaps significantly the CIA had been through many of
these buildings but they seem to have missed this particular document.”
Ok, so the CIA goes through the building, then the reporter goes in and
finds these hugely significant documents? And a couple papers claim to
have found them. So the CIA misses them, and a bunch of reporters come
in and they all find it. Or were there copies for each? And why, as one
article I read says, were some documents burnt, but not this one. It
just had “bin Laden” whited out. If you were burning documents, isn’t
this one that you’d burn? How stupid is it just to white out
incriminating words? The coming days will be interesting.