<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pay articles suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speedkill.org/2003/12/20/448/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2003/12/20/448/</link>
	<description>Radioactive Toy</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stradiotto</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2003/12/20/448/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Stradiotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2003/12/448/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>MoJo has grown increasingly uneven in the last few years. They've even started printing specious articles written by wingnuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MoJo has grown increasingly uneven in the last few years. They&#8217;ve even started printing specious articles written by wingnuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2003/12/20/448/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2003/12/448/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>He's definitely a wingnut, but from what I know of the article it was decent.  It basically said that Bush is anti-wilderness because he grew up in Texas and doesn't know what the kind of wilderness out here is like.  Which is dead on, I think (and the source of the synopsis thinks as well, and he's by no means anti-Bush).  I don't really ever read Mother Jones, but the issue the article is in looked pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s definitely a wingnut, but from what I know of the article it was decent.  It basically said that Bush is anti-wilderness because he grew up in Texas and doesn&#8217;t know what the kind of wilderness out here is like.  Which is dead on, I think (and the source of the synopsis thinks as well, and he&#8217;s by no means anti-Bush).  I don&#8217;t really ever read Mother Jones, but the issue the article is in looked pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stradiotto</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2003/12/20/448/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Stradiotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2003/12/448/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I've got the article here. You're not missing a great deal. It's throbbingly passionate in the way that kills causes. It's kind of like finding out that humorless Maoists want to back your run for office.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got the article here. You&#8217;re not missing a great deal. It&#8217;s throbbingly passionate in the way that kills causes. It&#8217;s kind of like finding out that humorless Maoists want to back your run for office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
