<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, it was a good run</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speedkill.org/2004/11/02/812/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2004/11/02/812/</link>
	<description>Radioactive Toy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2004/11/02/812/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2004/11/812/#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>I kinda figured that. I'm gonna see if shrinking the box makes it better for him, or if it just automatically goes under no matter what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda figured that. I&#8217;m gonna see if shrinking the box makes it better for him, or if it just automatically goes under no matter what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heliologue</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2004/11/02/812/#comment-1281</link>
		<dc:creator>heliologue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2004/11/812/#comment-1281</guid>
		<description>It's something on his end, Jeff.  I get no strange behavior at that resolution.  The text entry field is designed to stay a set distance from the link bar.  Even crappy IE displays it properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s something on his end, Jeff.  I get no strange behavior at that resolution.  The text entry field is designed to stay a set distance from the link bar.  Even crappy IE displays it properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2004/11/02/812/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 16:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2004/11/812/#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...very strange. I'll look at the template some more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;very strange. I&#8217;ll look at the template some more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wulfgar</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2004/11/02/812/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Wulfgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 05:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2004/11/812/#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>I run 1162 x 864, both at home and at work.  IE 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run 1162 x 864, both at home and at work.  IE 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2004/11/02/812/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 05:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2004/11/812/#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>Really? What resolution are you on? I tried 800x600 and it was fine. I can't go lower than that. It's set by columns so it should resize depending on resolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? What resolution are you on? I tried 800&#215;600 and it was fine. I can&#8217;t go lower than that. It&#8217;s set by columns so it should resize depending on resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wulfgar</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2004/11/02/812/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>Wulfgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 05:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2004/11/812/#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>Yes, Jeff, I did.  But when I type out comments that go long (as mine tend to do) they go undernieth the sidebar to the right.  ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Jeff, I did.  But when I type out comments that go long (as mine tend to do) they go undernieth the sidebar to the right.  ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2004/11/02/812/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 02:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2004/11/812/#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>Wulfgar - 

I don't think they want to be convinced either, but I think as the youth of today get older it'll get better. That's what I'm hoping, at least.

Comments look fine to me in both Firefox and IE. Did you try refreshing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wulfgar - </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they want to be convinced either, but I think as the youth of today get older it&#8217;ll get better. That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m hoping, at least.</p>
<p>Comments look fine to me in both Firefox and IE. Did you try refreshing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fate</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2004/11/02/812/#comment-1273</link>
		<dc:creator>Fate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 02:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2004/11/812/#comment-1273</guid>
		<description>I don't want to leave my room for 4 years.... I really wonder in the future if we will find out the election was rigged by Diebold in Florida and Ohio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to leave my room for 4 years&#8230;. I really wonder in the future if we will find out the election was rigged by Diebold in Florida and Ohio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wulfgar</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2004/11/02/812/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>Wulfgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2004/11/812/#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>And, for the record, my comment preview is under the sidebar, so spelling and grammatical errors aren't open to scrutiny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, for the record, my comment preview is under the sidebar, so spelling and grammatical errors aren&#8217;t open to scrutiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wulfgar</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2004/11/02/812/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>Wulfgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/index.php/archives/2004/11/812/#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>"It is combined with the fact that we lost on social issues, which is absolutely something that we need to convince the rest of the country on. That’s going to happen one way or another, but we can make it happen faster."

Alas, this is our point of disagreement.  I don't think that the country wants to be convinced.  They have their Bible, and they have George Bush.  Social issues are not the lynchpin of the electorate; religious and moral issues seem to be.  I, for onr, am not at all convinced that those participating in modern elections can be swayed away from those holy writs.  They believe them selves to be right.  And right they will remain.  I'm not totally disagreeing with what you've written, Jeff.  I'm just saying that it might not matter with a group of voters who care more about God's will than about any logical reasonable argumant that you or I can posit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is combined with the fact that we lost on social issues, which is absolutely something that we need to convince the rest of the country on. That’s going to happen one way or another, but we can make it happen faster.&#8221;</p>
<p>Alas, this is our point of disagreement.  I don&#8217;t think that the country wants to be convinced.  They have their Bible, and they have George Bush.  Social issues are not the lynchpin of the electorate; religious and moral issues seem to be.  I, for onr, am not at all convinced that those participating in modern elections can be swayed away from those holy writs.  They believe them selves to be right.  And right they will remain.  I&#8217;m not totally disagreeing with what you&#8217;ve written, Jeff.  I&#8217;m just saying that it might not matter with a group of voters who care more about God&#8217;s will than about any logical reasonable argumant that you or I can posit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
