Comments on: For some, thinking is not their strong suit http://www.speedkill.org/2007/02/05/1702/ Radioactive Toy Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:08:16 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Heliologue http://www.speedkill.org/2007/02/05/1702/comment-page-1/#comment-427456 Heliologue Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:06:43 +0000 http://www.speedkill.org/2007/02/05/1702/#comment-427456 Ah, Steve Milloy, mouthpiece for Industry. Ah, Steve Milloy, mouthpiece for Industry.

]]> By: Jeff http://www.speedkill.org/2007/02/05/1702/comment-page-1/#comment-427443 Jeff Wed, 07 Feb 2007 02:46:28 +0000 http://www.speedkill.org/2007/02/05/1702/#comment-427443 Considering Steve Milloy is little more than an industry propagandist (<a href="http://timlambert.org/category/science/milloy/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://crookedtimber.org/2004/09/01/soft-drinks-and-hard-evidence/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">here</a>), I'm not exactly inclined to trust his interpretations of those papers. The NAS and the IPCC, who have produced comprehensive reviews of the evidence, and are qualified to do such things, say the evidence points the other direction. Considering Steve Milloy is little more than an industry propagandist (here and here), I’m not exactly inclined to trust his interpretations of those papers. The NAS and the IPCC, who have produced comprehensive reviews of the evidence, and are qualified to do such things, say the evidence points the other direction.

]]> By: rob http://www.speedkill.org/2007/02/05/1702/comment-page-1/#comment-427419 rob Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:25:51 +0000 http://www.speedkill.org/2007/02/05/1702/#comment-427419 I'm not sure what to think, personally, but from what I've read there's more evidence than conspiracy nutcases for carbon dioxide at least being a secondary cause of climate change, e.g. this collection of reliable sources: <a href="http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/guide.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/guide.html</a> I’m not sure what to think, personally, but from what I’ve read there’s more evidence than conspiracy nutcases for carbon dioxide at least being a secondary cause of climate change, e.g. this collection of reliable sources:

http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/guide.html

]]>