<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transparently wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speedkill.org/2007/05/21/1786/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2007/05/21/1786/</link>
	<description>Radioactive Toy</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2007/05/21/1786/#comment-432038</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 02:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/2007/05/21/1786/#comment-432038</guid>
		<description>There's no question that the Bible should be taught as literature and KJV should feature prominently in any discussion of the Bible's impact on our culture. Sadly, we keep getting courses like the above, which are indoctrination, not education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no question that the Bible should be taught as literature and KJV should feature prominently in any discussion of the Bible&#8217;s impact on our culture. Sadly, we keep getting courses like the above, which are indoctrination, not education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Rightmire</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2007/05/21/1786/#comment-431994</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Rightmire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 06:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/2007/05/21/1786/#comment-431994</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that the King James version should be taught as literature since it has some of the most powerful language in literature used in many titles and phrases in the secular world today.  Ecclisiastes is a powerful piece of writing and the Song of Songs is sexier than almost anything written today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that the King James version should be taught as literature since it has some of the most powerful language in literature used in many titles and phrases in the secular world today.  Ecclisiastes is a powerful piece of writing and the Song of Songs is sexier than almost anything written today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2007/05/21/1786/#comment-431988</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 03:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/2007/05/21/1786/#comment-431988</guid>
		<description>There are problems with that course (as I've noted &lt;a href="http://www.speedkill.org/2006/05/31/1480/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) and I don't think it should be allowed either, but role-playing seems to be a fairly neutral (if confusing) activity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are problems with that course (as I&#8217;ve noted <a href="http://www.speedkill.org/2006/05/31/1480/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">here</a>) and I don&#8217;t think it should be allowed either, but role-playing seems to be a fairly neutral (if confusing) activity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2007/05/21/1786/#comment-431982</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 01:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/2007/05/21/1786/#comment-431982</guid>
		<description>I dunno.  What's the difference between that course (an elective, BTW) and &lt;a href="http://www.nsba.org/site/doc_cosa.asp?TRACKID=&#38;VID=50&#38;CID=468&#38;DID=37401" rel="nofollow"&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno.  What&#8217;s the difference between that course (an elective, BTW) and <a href="http://www.nsba.org/site/doc_cosa.asp?TRACKID=&amp;VID=50&amp;CID=468&amp;DID=37401" rel="nofollow">this one</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
