<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NOM NOM NOM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speedkill.org/2009/04/08/2285/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2009/04/08/2285/</link>
	<description>Radioactive Toy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:19:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2009/04/08/2285/comment-page-1/#comment-545654</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/?p=2285#comment-545654</guid>
		<description>Ideally, that would be the way to go. But you&#039;re really just quibbling over a name. What the government considers a marriage isn&#039;t inherently different from any sort of &quot;civil union&quot; you define.

So yes, if I were creating a government, I would avoid the religious baggage of the word &quot;marriage.&quot; But since changing marriage to &quot;civil union&quot; or any other name is never going to happen and would probably be more controversial than gay marriage, it&#039;s not a useful position to hold. It&#039;s like saying you don&#039;t believe in Thursday because you don&#039;t worship Thor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ideally, that would be the way to go. But you&#8217;re really just quibbling over a name. What the government considers a marriage isn&#8217;t inherently different from any sort of &#8220;civil union&#8221; you define.</p>
<p>So yes, if I were creating a government, I would avoid the religious baggage of the word &#8220;marriage.&#8221; But since changing marriage to &#8220;civil union&#8221; or any other name is never going to happen and would probably be more controversial than gay marriage, it&#8217;s not a useful position to hold. It&#8217;s like saying you don&#8217;t believe in Thursday because you don&#8217;t worship Thor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fate One</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2009/04/08/2285/comment-page-1/#comment-545633</link>
		<dc:creator>Fate One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/?p=2285#comment-545633</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe in legalizing same sex marriage because I don&#039;t believe in legal marriage at all. Marriage is a religious institution. Let the church figure out who they want to marry. If your church wants to marry you to God, to your dog, to your house, your money, or your boat.. go for it. The government needs to get out of the marriage business entirely. Everyone gets a civil union.. if you&#039;re over 18 or an emancipated minor or by some means a legal adult.. you can have a civil union with any other legal adult. I don&#039;t care if that adult is green and likes to have sex with furniture. You can have a civil union with that other adult. If you can then find a church that will marry you, your partner, and your sofa.. as part of some three-way furniture fucking sex cult.. go for it. That is between you and the church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe in legalizing same sex marriage because I don&#8217;t believe in legal marriage at all. Marriage is a religious institution. Let the church figure out who they want to marry. If your church wants to marry you to God, to your dog, to your house, your money, or your boat.. go for it. The government needs to get out of the marriage business entirely. Everyone gets a civil union.. if you&#8217;re over 18 or an emancipated minor or by some means a legal adult.. you can have a civil union with any other legal adult. I don&#8217;t care if that adult is green and likes to have sex with furniture. You can have a civil union with that other adult. If you can then find a church that will marry you, your partner, and your sofa.. as part of some three-way furniture fucking sex cult.. go for it. That is between you and the church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.speedkill.org/2009/04/08/2285/comment-page-1/#comment-541883</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedkill.org/?p=2285#comment-541883</guid>
		<description>The beauty of that inclusion of &quot;60% of African-Americans&quot; is that it manages to even incorporate TWO logical fallacies into the argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The beauty of that inclusion of &#8220;60% of African-Americans&#8221; is that it manages to even incorporate TWO logical fallacies into the argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.167 seconds -->
