Archive

Archive for the ‘2004 election cycle’ Category

Is this enough?

June 3rd, 2006

Is Kennedy’s latest “investigative” piece in Rolling Stone enough to make people ignore him? Probably not. Still, with a factually challenged piece on autism and Thimerosal and an unconvincing piece on 2004 election fraud, it should be. The man is a dishonest hack. Maybe he hasn’t always been (I’m not old enough to have a good handle on his history), but it’s pretty clear that Rolling Stone should be embarrassed by his lame attempts at investigative journalism.

On the other hand, his latest piece did provoke a hilariously stupid comment from one of Montana’s right-wing bloggers. Maybe it isn’t all bad.

Jeff 2004 election cycle, Skepticism

The GAO and e-voting

November 16th, 2005

How fitting…

December 16th, 2004

Theocrats unite!

November 12th, 2004

He’s a “journalist?”

November 8th, 2004

Uh, about that values thing…

November 8th, 2004

The definition of a sore loser

November 4th, 2004

I’m in the minority

November 4th, 2004

Well, it was a good run

November 2nd, 2004

Ugh, it’s almost over

November 1st, 2004
1569780 spams devoured by SK